<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Regulator tells lenders to adopt reasonable repossession policies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badcredit-mortgages4u.co.uk/mortgage-news/regulator-tells-lenders-to-adopt-reasonable-repossession-policies/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badcredit-mortgages4u.co.uk/mortgage-news/regulator-tells-lenders-to-adopt-reasonable-repossession-policies</link>
	<description>Compare Bad Credit Mortgages across the whole market</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.badcredit-mortgages4u.co.uk/mortgage-news/regulator-tells-lenders-to-adopt-reasonable-repossession-policies#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 09:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/nov/29/banking-mortgages-regulation#comment-55</guid>
		<description>The fact that they need reminding to be reasonable suggests that regulation isn't tight enough - i.e. under normal circumstances, it would be ok to be 'unreasonable'?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that they need reminding to be reasonable suggests that regulation isn&#8217;t tight enough - i.e. under normal circumstances, it would be ok to be &#8216;unreasonable&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.badcredit-mortgages4u.co.uk/mortgage-news/regulator-tells-lenders-to-adopt-reasonable-repossession-policies#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 09:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/nov/29/banking-mortgages-regulation#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Half the banks are owned by the UK taxpayer. Surely there is an inherent conflict of interests here: the banks need to be profitable to pay us back again. Ergo, no charity to defaulters!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Half the banks are owned by the UK taxpayer. Surely there is an inherent conflict of interests here: the banks need to be profitable to pay us back again. Ergo, no charity to defaulters!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

